The goal of this web site is to inform the American people about the history, plans, tactics and goals of the socialist opposition and its ties to world socialism.  We will do whatever is necessary to regain the manufacturing leadership of the world.

    Republican Party people and candidates I've talked to seem to lack important knowledge of historical political events.  We must correct that problem.

    Our opponents are well organized and well funded by the socialist cabal.  They have an instantaneous network to get their party talking points out quickly so each one of them speak exactly the same words and phrases for each event or subject.

    To defeat your opponent one must know your opponent better than he knows him or herself.  We must identify and counter their strategies.  We will develop techniques to neutralize their attacks on our members and goals.  Fortunately their plans have been published in many books and magazine articles.  We intend to take full advantage.

    We must develop and refine our talking points.  Each point must be in a searchable standard document format containing all details and discussing all pros and cons of the event.  The heading must be short, hard hitting and to the point.  The heading will be repeated over and over until people understand the point completely.

    We however, will not win elections by just defending and attacking. We will present a bold, far reaching plan to recover our lost manufacturing base.  We will again be the manufacturing leader of the world.  Japan, with our help, did it after WWII.  Within 15 years they were taking out our industries one after another.  The goal of our party is to take them back one after another.  We will become the new USA Inc.  We will do it in less than 15 years.  We will accept nothing less.

Prologue:

    Known as the "father of modern American radicalism," Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) developed strategies and tactics that take the enormous, unfocused emotional energy of grassroots groups and transform it into effective anti-government and anti-corporate activism.   Activist organizations teach his ideas widely today as a set of model behaviors,  and they use these principles to create an emotional commitment to victory - no matter what.

    In Rules for Radicals Saul Alinsky writes,  "There's another reason for working inside the system.   Dostoevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most.   Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive,  affirmative,  non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people.

    They must feel so frustrated,  so defeated,  so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future.   This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution."

    This is where President Barack Obama's campaign about "Change" comes from. He is not talking about positive change but rather the change outlined by his mentor Saul Alinsky.   Revolutionary change.   Socialist change.   Communist change.

    In order to reach his goal President Obama,  with the help of the radical left,  the media and the Democratic party,  is setting the stage for this radical leftist change agenda.   He and his supporters have demonized President Bush,  Republicans,  Conservatives,  Christians and those who believe in America.

    Obama believes,  "the most effective means are whatever will achieve the desired ends",  even if that means lying,  cheating and stealing.   Obama will change the future.

    Yes,  change the future for the worst.

    The Democrat party has been using Alinsky since the 70's.

Excepts from Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky

    Tactics mean doing what you can with what you have.

    Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them.   In the world of give and take,  tactics is the art of how to take and how to give.

    Here our concern is with the tactic of taking;  how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.   For an elementary illustration of tactics, take parts of your face as the point of reference;  your eyes, your ears,  and your nose.

    First the eyes;  if you have organized a vast,  mass-based people’s organization,  you can parade it visibly before the enemy and openly show your power.

    Second the ears;  if your organization is small in numbers, then...conceal the members in the dark but raise a din and clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more than it does.

    Third,  the nose;  if your organization is too tiny even for noise,  stink up the place.

Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals explained

    Union organizers are often highly trained.   In many unions this training includes indoctrination in Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals."

    Saul Alinsky was a ruthless radical organizer.   He would stop at nothing to win.   Before he passed away in 1972 he published a book called "Rules for Radicals" in which he outlined his power tactics and questionable ethics.

    Anyone interested in staying,  or becoming,  Union Free, whether in an organizing campaign or in a decertification or deauthorization election, ought to become familiar with these rules.

    This can be very valuable information.   As one expert observer points out "Rules for Radicals are reversible and can be used against the Left."

    Here's a brief summary of the rules.   We are indebted to the Public Service Research Foundation for this information.

Rules for Power Tactics:

RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from two main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.

RULE 11: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 12: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 13: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

Rules sumation:

    In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and “frozen.” By this I mean that in a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a constant, and somewhat legitimate, passing of the buck. The target is always trying to shift responsibility to get out of being the target.

    One of the criteria in picking your target is the target’s vulnerability – where do you have the power to start? Furthermore, the target can always say, “Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?” When you “freeze the target,” you disregard these arguments and, for the moment, all others to blame.

    Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all of the “others” come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.

    The other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract such as a community’s segregated practices or a major corporation or City Hall. It is not possible to develop the necessary hostility against, say, City Hall, which after all is a concrete, physical, inanimate structure, or against a corporation, which has no soul or identity, or a public school administration, which again is an inanimate system.

Attack, attack, attack:

    Alinsky advised the radical activist to avoid the temptation to concede that his opponent was not "100 per cent devil," or that he possessed certain admirable qualities such as being "a good churchgoing man, generous to charity, and a good husband." Such qualifying remarks, Alinsky said, "dilut[e] the impact of the attack" and amount to sheer "political idiocy

    Given that the enemy was to be portrayed as the very personification of evil, against whom any and all methods were fair game, Alinsky taught that an effective organizer should never give the appearance of being fully satisfied as a result of having resolved any particular conflict via compromise. Any compromise with the "devil" is, after all, by definition morally tainted and thus inadequate. Consequently, while the organizer may acknowledge that he is pleased by the compromise as a small step in the right direction, he must make it absolutely clear that there is still a long way to go, and that many grievances still remain unaddressed. The ultimate goal, said Alinsky, is not to arrive at compromise or peaceful coexistence, but rather to "crush the opposition," bit by bit. "A People's Organization is dedicated to eternal war," said Alinsky. "… A war is not an intellectual debate, and in the war against social evils there are no rules of fair play.… When you have war, it means that neither side can agree on anything…. In our war against the social menaces of mankind there can be no compromise. It is life or death."

    Alinsky warned the organizer to be on guard against the possibility that the enemy might offer him "a constructive alternative" aimed at resolving the conflict. Said Alinsky, "You cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying, 'You're right -- we don't know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us.'" Such capitulation by the enemy would have the effect of diffusing the righteous indignation of the People's Organization, whose very identity is inextricably woven into the fight for long-denied justice; i.e., whose struggle and identity are synonymous. If the perceived oppressor surrenders or extends a hand of friendship in an effort to end the conflict, the crusade of the People's Organization is jeopardized. This cannot be permitted. Eternal war, by definition, must never end.

    While Alinsky endorsed ruthlessness in waging war against the enemy, he was nonetheless mindful that certain approaches were more likely to win the hearts and minds of the people whose support would be crucial to the organizers' ultimate victory. Above all, he taught that in order to succeed, the organizer and his People's Organization needed to target their message toward the middle class. "Mankind," said Alinsky, "has been and is divided into three parts: the Haves, the Have-Nots, and the Have-a-Little, Want Mores." He explained that in America, the Have-a-Little, Want-Mores (i.e., members of the middle class) were the most numerous and therefore of the utmost importance. Said Alinsky: "Torn between upholding the status quo to protect the little they have, yet wanting change so they can get more, they [the middle class] become split personalities… Thermopolitically they are tepid and rooted in inertia. Today in Western society and particularly in the United States they comprise the majority of our population."

    Because Alinsky was sensitive to criticism that he wasn't ethical, he also included a set of rules for the ethics of power tactics. You can see from these why his ethics were so frequently questioned.

Rules to test whether power tactics are ethical:

1. One's concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one's personal interest in the issue.

2. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.

3. In war the end justifies almost any means.

4. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.

5. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.

7. Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.

8. The morality of means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.

9. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition to be unethical.

10. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments.

11. Goals must be phrased in general terms like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," "Of the Common Welfare," "Pursuit of Happiness," or "Bread and Peace."

    These are just the highlights. There's obviously a lot more to it. Alinsky's book is still available in most college bookstores and on Amazon and is worth reading.

    As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
    "Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy's camp."

Support Documents:

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963.

Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963.

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen.

All 45 tenets have been achieved in America but pay close attention to #'s 15-45.

1) US acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war 

2) US willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war 

3) Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the US would be a demonstration of "moral strength" 

4) Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war

5) Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet Satellites 

6) Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination 

7) Grant recognition of Red China, and admission of Red China to the UN 

8) Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the UN 

9) Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the US has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress 

10) Allow all Soviet Satellites individual representation in the UN 

11) Promote the UN as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the UN as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo) 

12) Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party 

13) Do away with loyalty oaths 

14) Continue giving Russia access to the US Patent Office

15) Capture one or both of the political parties in the US

16) Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights

17) Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism, and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in text books

18) Gain control of all student newspapers

19) Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack

20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions

21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures

22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings", substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.

23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. " Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art"

24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press

25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.

26) Present Homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy"

27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social"religion Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch"

28) Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state"

29) Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis

30) Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man"

31) Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of "the big picture:" Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over

32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33) Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus

34) Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities

35) Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI

36) Infiltrate and gain control of more unions

37) Infiltrate and gain control of big business

38) Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat

39) Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals

40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce

41) Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents

42) Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a "united force" to solve economic, political, or social problems

43) Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government

44) Internationalize the Panama Canal

45) Repeal the Connally Reservation so the US can not prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike

Obama's Security Service

    A Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or Fascist dictatorship. (11/2008)

    "It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he's the one who proposed this national security force," Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. "I'm just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may -- may not, I hope not -- but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism."

    Broun cited a July speech by Obama that has circulated on the Internet in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate called for a civilian force to take some of the national security burden off the military.

    "That's exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it's exactly what the Soviet Union did," Broun said. "When he's proposing to have a national security force that's answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he's showing me signs of being Marxist."

    Obama's comments about a national security force came during a speech in Colorado about building a new civil service corps. Among other things, he called for expanding the nation's foreign service and doubling the size of the Peace Corps "to renew our diplomacy."

    "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," Obama said in July. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

    Broun said he also believes Obama likely will move to ban gun ownership if he does build a national police force.

    Obama has said he respects the Second Amendment right to bear arms and favors "common sense" gun laws. Gun rights advocates interpret that as meaning he'll at least enact curbs on ownership of assault weapons and concealed weapons. As an Illinois state lawmaker, Obama supported a ban on semiautomatic weapons and tighter restrictions on firearms generally.

    "We can't be lulled into complacency," Broun said. "You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I'm not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I'm saying is there is the potential."

    Obama's transition office did not respond immediately to Broun's remarks.

    We must do whatever it takes to reverse the outflow of our manufacturing jobs.  Jobs have left because products made here are too costly.  We must identify and analyze why and correct the problems.  We cannot remain the leader of the free world without an extensive industrial base.  The Commerce Department should assume primary responsibility and that may require some anti-trust law adjustment. 

Primary Causes For Manufacturing Losses:

• High Corporate Taxes

    Our corporate taxes are the second highest in the industrial world.   They mainly support welfare entitlement programs put in place because of job losses.   Most programs are not needed with full employment.

• High Environmental Costs

    Our environmental efforts have been a huge success.   Our worst polluters are gone and with them thousands and thousands of jobs.   We threw the baby out with the bath water.   Good planning.

• High Wage and Benefit Costs

    High wage costs are is a result of labor laws passed during the 1930's.   At that time congress legalized extortion as a union bargaining tool.   Initially this tactic was great for the worker and the country but in the latter 50 years or so it has been the single most important thing that caused job loss and the decline of our country.   The use of extortion must be made illegal once again.

• High Medical Costs

    High medical costs is a complex problem.  The first is patients have no idea of costs of provided services.  The second is the very high amount of free care to non-payers.  The third is defensive medicine because of fear of lawsuits.

Solutions:

• High Corporate Taxes

    Our corporate taxes should be no higher than the EU average.  The taxes must be low enough to bring back all the jobs lost in the last 30 years. 

• High Environmental Costs

    Our environmental laws have hurt more than helped world pollution.  Our costly strict laws have only caused the pollution and our jobs to be shipped overseas, out of reach of our laws.  Satellite detectors have shown pollution from China crossing the Pacific and literally engulfing the west coast.  We must have intelligent people revise all of our current environmental laws to bring back our jobs.  California pollution levels will improve as an extra benefit. 
    Man made global warming is a complete hoax.  It is the largest scam in history.  We must list all these people pushing it and ban them from any further influence. 

• High Wage and Benefit Costs

    High wage costs in the auto industry has been the main driver for high wages.  Auto industry jobs are a very small percentage over all but most of the rise in prices match their wages.  People not in the auto industry make less than half and work twice as hard.  Auto industry competition is resolving that problem.  The use of extortion must be made illegal once again to level the playing field.  Unions are necessary but in a differnt form.  High value workers should be paid their worth.  Seniority should be balanced with ability. 

• High Medical Costs

    The number one fix is to limit legal fees to a maximum of 10 percent of the net award to the victim.  Law firms must be penalized for bad suits.  The law firms must pay all costs of lost cases.  All medical plans should involve the patients choice with a co-pay, except for catastrophic problems.  Emergency patients not in trauma should be directed to a clinic first, the clinic could then move them on to an emergency room if necessary. 

    Conservatives must learn and employ the Alinsky tactics that were so successful for the democrats.   First, goals must be set, targets identified and tactics assigned.   A responsible person must be assigned to each task.   Task progress must be monitored continuously.

Short term goals:

• Democrats own the financial mess
• Neutralize the Socialist media bias
• Block the Socialist agenda

Long term goals:

• Convert ABC, CBS or NBC to Patriotism
• Promote adding Fox News to over-the-air TV
• Promote Nationalism and Patriotism
• Regain the House in 2010
• Regain the Senate in 2010
• Regain the Presidency in 2012
• Replace Socialism with Nationalism in education
• Restore our country's industrial base

Targets:

• Polosi: Ridicule
• Reid: Ridicule
• Obama: Ridicule
• Dodd: Criminal Investigation
• Frank: Criminal Investigation
• ACORN: Criminal Investigation
• B.Clinton: Caused financial problem
• Leftist MSM
• Socialism

We welcome your comments about The Internet Voice of Donald Delozier.